Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Kerala High Court

Manual Joseph Antony vs Sub-Inspector Of Police on 20 August, 2015

Author: K. Abraham Mathew

Bench: K.Abraham Mathew

       

  

   

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                             PRESENT:

                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

              THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/29TH SRAVANA, 1937

                                  Bail Appl..No. 8594 of 2014 ()
                                     -------------------------------
     (CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF UDAYAMPEROOR POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM
                                             DISTRICT)
                                             ----------------


PETITIONER :
-----------------------

            MANUAL JOSEPH ANTONY, AGED 32 YEARS,
            S/O ANTONY, PUTHENVEETTIL, CHEMPUMUKKU,
            KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM-682 021.

            BY ADV. SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

        1. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
            UDAYAMPEROOR POLICE STATION. PIN-682 081

        2. STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

             BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH

            THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 20-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
            FOLLOWING:




sts



                     K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
                    ====================
                        B.A.No. 8594 of 2014
                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
               Dated this the 20th day of August, 2015

                                 O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner apprehends that he will be arrested by the police on the accusation that he has committed some offences in respect of an immovable property.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that Udayamperoor police had registered a Crime No. 1184 of 2014 against him. But it has been referred as the dispute was of a civil nature. A report has been filed before the court concerned to that effect. So, the petitioner need not apprehend arrest and detention.

In the result, this application is dismissed.

Sd/-

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, JUDGE DST //True copy// P.A. To Judge