Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

C.V.Bimal Roy vs State Of Kerala

Author: S.S.Satheesachandran

Bench: S.S.Satheesachandran

       

  

  

 
 
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                                  PRESENT:

              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN

             THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2012/4TH SRAVANA 1934

                                       Crl.MC.No. 1455 of 2012 ()
                                             --------------------------
                 CRIME NO.549/2011 OF VARAPPUZHA POLICE STATION
                                             --------------------------

    PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
    -------------------------------------

       C.V.BIMAL ROY, AGED 40 YEARS,
       S/O. G. VISHNU DAS,''POURNAMI'',
       K.P. V/194, KUDAPPANAKKUNNU,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

       BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP

    RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
    ------------------------------------------------

      1. STATE OF KERALA,
         REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
         HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

    *ADDL.R2 & R3 IMPLEADED

    *R2: GIRISH BABU.G., AGED 36YEARS,
           S/O.LATE.P.K.GOPALAKRISHNAN, RESIDING AT PUNNAKKADAN
           HOUSE,CUSAT POST, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE,
           KANNAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

    *ADDL.R2 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 8/6/2012 IN CRL.M.A.NO.3086/2012

    *R3: BASHEER.K.M., AGED 47 YEARS,S/O.K.A.MAMMU,
           KALLIKKATTIL HOUSE, P.O.KOTHAPARAMPU, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

    *ADDL.R3 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 29/6/12 IN CRL.M.A.NO.4063/2012

     R1 BY ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION SRI.C.RASHEED
     R2 BY ADV. SMT.SANDHYA RAJU
     R3 BY ADV. SMT.K.V.BHADRA KUMARI
                       SMT.ANILA GEORGE

     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
     ON 26-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

CRMC.NO.1455/2012

                               APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

ANNEX 1     COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIMENO.549 OF 2011 VARAPPUZHA POLICE
            STATION

ANNEX II    COPY OF THE 161 STATEMENT DATED 05/08/11

ANNEX III   COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 10/08/2011

ANNEX IV    COPY OF HE 161 STATEMENT DATED 09/08/2011

ANNEX V     COPY OF THE 161 STATEMENT DATED 18/08/11

ANNEX VI    COPY OF THE 164 STATEMENT BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE DATED
            29/08/11

ANNEX VII   COPY OF THE 161 STATEMENT DATED 06/10/11

ANNEX VIII  COPY OF THE REMAND REPORT OF ACCUSED A-43 DATED 28/10/11

ANNEX IX    COPY OF THE PAGE NO.9 OF MALAYALA MANORAMMA DAILY
            KOTTAYMA EDITION DATED 03/01/12

ANNEX X     COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 07/01/2012 BY WHICH THE PETITIONER IS
            IMPLICATED AS ACCUSED A-61

ANNEX XI    COPY OF THE REMAND APPLICATION IN CRIME NO.1500/12 OF ALUVA
            POLICE STATION.


RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:              NIL



                                     /TRUE COPY/



                                     P.A.TO.JUDGE

sts



                 S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.
                      -------------------------------
                   Crl.M.C.NO.1455 OF 2012
                    -----------------------------------
             Dated this the 26th day of July, 2012

                              O R D E R

Petitioner is one among the accused in Crime No.549 of 2011 of Varappuzha Police Station, in which, presently, investigation for offences punishable under Sections 366(A), 372, 373, 376, 354, 109 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code is being proceeded with. Petitioner has been arrayed as accused No.61 in the aforesaid crime. Though very many grounds are raised in the petition to assail the implication of petitioner as one among the accused, to contend that the allegations are totally false, at the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that reserving his challenges against the final report, if any such report is filed against him under Section 173 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petition may be disposed. In the light of the submissions made by the counsel, as aforesaid, I find, no dilation over the challenges canvassed by him in the Crl.M.C.NO.1455/2012 2 petition need be considered at this stage.

Petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to canvass whatever challenges available to him under law to impeach the final report, if such report is filed against him in the crime.

S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp