Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Gujarat State Road Transport ... vs Y.A.Mogul C/O I M Tarajia on 17 March, 2015

Author: Ks Jhaveri

Bench: Ks Jhaveri, A.G.Uraizee

          C/LPA/461/2015                                  JUDGMENT




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 461 of 2015
                                     In
             SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 23229 of 2005
                                   With
                     CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3331 of 2015
                                     In
                 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 461 of 2015



FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:


HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI


and


HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE

================================================================

1     Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see
      the judgment ?

2     To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

3     Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the
      judgment ?

4     Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as
      to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any order
      made thereunder ?

================================================================
    GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION....Appellant(s)
                              Versus
             Y.A.MOGUL C/O I M TARAJIA....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR ASHISH M DAGLI, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR GK RATHOD, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1


                                  Page 1 of 3
           C/LPA/461/2015                                       JUDGMENT



MR MUKESH H RATHOD, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE

                               Date : 17/03/2015
                               ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI)

1. Admit. With the consent of both the sides, the matter is heard  finally today.

2. This Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the judgment and  order dated 11.07.2011 passed by the learned single Judge in the  captioned writ petition by which the same was rejected.

3. We   have   heard   learned   counsel   for   both   the   sides.  Admittedly, the impugned order passed by the learned single Judge  is a non­speaking order. The learned single Judge has not assigned  any reasons while rejecting the writ petition filed by the appellant  wherein the main relief was to quash and set aside the order passed  by the Industrial Tribunal in Reference (IT) No.54 of 1990 as also  the   order   passed   by   the   Industrial   Tribunal   during   pendency   of  reference   below   Exhibit­34   dated   30.10.2002.   In   view   of   the  aforesaid, in the fitness of things, it would be appropriate that the  learned   single   Judge   decides   the   matter   on   merits   by   passing   a  reasoned order.

4. Consequently,   the   appeal   is   partly   allowed.   The   impugned  Page 2 of 3 C/LPA/461/2015 JUDGMENT order   dated   11.07.2011   passed   by   the   learned   single   Judge   is  quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded to the learned  single Judge with a request to consider the same afresh, by passing  a   reasoned   order,   after   hearing   both   the   sides.   With   the   above  direction,   the   appeal   stands   disposed   of.   The   civil   application  stands disposed of accordingly.

(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) (A.G.URAIZEE,J) Pravin Page 3 of 3