Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Indrakashi Devi vs The State Of Karnataka on 19 March, 2024

Bench: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Aravind Kumar

                                                 1




     ITEM NO.10                         COURT NO.16                SECTION IV-A

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Civil Appeal            No(s).   3309-3310/1997

     INDRAKASHI DEVI & ORS.                                        Appellant(s)

                                                VERSUS


     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.                                 Respondent(s)


     ([ONLY CONMT.PET. (c) NO. 716/23, CONMT.PET.(C)No.688/2021 AND
     CONMT.PET.(C)No.578/2022 ARE LISTED UNDER THIS ITEM.] )

     WITH
     CONMT.PET.(C) No. 688/2021 in C.A. No. 3309-3310/1997 (IV-A)

     CONMT.PET.(C) No. 578/2022 in C.A. No. 3305/1997 (IV-A)
     (FOR ADMISSION)

      CONMT.PET.(C) No. 716/2023 in C.A. No. 3307/1997 (IV-A)
     (IA No. 39734/2023 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
     IA No. 58749/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

     Date : 19-03-2024 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR


     For Appellant(s)             Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Adv.
                                  Mr. P. Balaji Verma, Adv.
                                  Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv.
                                  Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv.
                                  Mr. Eeshan D. Khaire, Adv.
                                  M/S. Lawyer S Knit & Co, AOR
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
Indu Marwah
Date: 2024.03.23                  Mr. C. Ariyama Sundaram, Sr. Adv.
10:53:40 IST
Reason:                           Dr. Aditya Sondhi, Sr. Adv.
                                  Mr. T. Harish Kumar, AOR
                                  Mr. Navneet Dugar, Adv.
                                  Mr. Nayantra B. G, Adv.
                                  2




                    Mr. Zafar Inyat, Adv.
                    Mr. Subham Kothari, Adv.
                    Ms. Preethi G, Adv.

                    Mrs. Lalita Kaushik, AOR
                    Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR

                    Mr. Manu Nair, Adv.
                    Mr. Neelabh Shreesh, Adv.
                    Mr. Aryan Roy, Adv.
                    Mr. S. S. Shroff, AOR

                    Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi, AOR

For Respondent(s)   Shri Rakesh Singh,IAS
                    Addl. Chief Secretary

                    Mr. Tushar Girnath IAS
                    Chief Commissioner of BBMP

                    Mr. Munish Mudgal IAS
                    Spl. Commissioner Revenue

                    Mr. Lakshmi Sagar, BBMP
                    Under Secretary, UDD

                    Mr. Shashi Kiran Shetty, AG,
                    State Of Karnataka,
                    Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR
                    Mr. Manendra Pal Gupta, Adv.
                    Mr. Adithya Bhat, Adv.
                    Ms. Adoorya Bomakka Harish, Adv.

                    Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr. Pai Amit, AOR
                    Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Adv.
                    Mr. Abhiyudaya Vats, Adv.
                    Mr. Tathagata Dutta, Adv.
                    Mr. Kushal Dube, Adv.
                    Mr. Deepak Sharma, Adv.
                    Mr. Chirag Gupta, Adv.

                    Mr. Mayank Jain, Adv.
                    Ms. Uditha Chakravarthy, Adv.
                    Ms. Shalaka Srivastava, Adv.
                    Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR

                    Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR
                                          3




            UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                               O R D E R

CONMT.PET. (c) NOS. 688/2021, 578/2022 AND 716/23

1. For non compliance of the order dated 21.11.2014 followed by order dated 17.05.2022, we have issued contempt notices to the respondents.

2. After some hearing, it is clear that the State shall issue necessary TDR as directed by this Court on 21.11.2014 and on 17.05.2022. Taking note of the submissions of the learned Advocate General, we direct compliance within a period of eight weeks from today.

3. Order dated 21.11.2014 does not specifically enable sale or transfer of the TDR, but directs grant of TDR as per Rules. To secure interests of all parties pending disposal of the Civil Appeals, we direct the recipient of the TDR to undertake return of the consideration received upon any sale or transfer of the TDR in the event the Civil Appeal(s) before Supreme Court are dismissed. An affidavit of Undertaking to this effect in the nature of personal bond(s) shall be furnished by the recipient of the TDR to the State before the sale or transfer of the TDR. We have not 4 expressed any opinion with regard to inter se dispute between the parties.

4. List the Contempt Petitions for reporting compliance on 17.05.2024.

5. Personal presence of the alleged contemnors are dispensed with for the present.

(INDU MARWAH)                                        (NIDHI WASON)
COURT MASTER (SH)                                 COURT MASTER (NSH)