Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Mahfooz Hussain vs The Station House Officer on 23 November, 2015

Author: K.Ramakrishnan

Bench: K.Ramakrishnan

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                                PRESENT:

                       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN

           MONDAY,THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1937

                                      Crl.MC.No. 7376 of 2015 ()
                                          ---------------------------
               STC NO. 4/2014 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, AMINI
                                             --------------------


PETITIONER/ACCUSED :
-------------------------------------

            MAHFOOZ HUSSAIN
            S/O. A.M. HUSSAIN, AGED 21
            B.SC & HA, INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT
            TARAMANI, CHENNAI.

            BY ADV. SRI.K.R.SUNIL

RESPONDENT :
------------------------

           THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            KAVARATHY POLICE STATION
            REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR
            LAKSHADWEEP ADMINISTRATION
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

            BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. SEENA RAMAKRISHNAN

            THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 23-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn


                                                                         ...2/-

Crl.MC.No. 7376 of 2015 ()

                                 APPENDIX


PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES :


ANNEXURE AI        : THE ORDER OF WARRANT OF ARREST ISSUED BY THE CJM
                     COURT, KAVARATHY.




RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL




                                                           //TRUE COPY//




                                                           P.A. TO JUDGE
Mn



         == == ==K.== == == == == == == ==
                       RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

                  Crl.M.C.No.7376 of 2015
         == == == == == == == == == == ==
         Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2015

                           O R D E R

This application filed by the petitioner who is accused in STC.No. 4 of 2014 on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate, (Juvenile Justice Board), Amini, Lakshadweep to issue directions to the court below under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. It is alleged in the petition that petitioner the student now studying for B.Sc. Hospitality and Hotel Administration at Institute of Hotel Management, Chennai. Petitioner met with an accident on 18.11.2010 while he was riding a two wheeler at Kavarathy Union Territory of Lakshadweep. He was riding bike with a friend and the bike hit apart a tree near Chicken Neck Area, Kavarathy. He sustained injuries and he was admitted in Indira Gandhi Hospital, Kavarathy. The respondent registered a case as crime no.25 of 2010 against the petitioner alleging offences

--2--

Crl.M.C.No.7376 of 2015

under Sections 279, 338 of Indian Penal Code and Section 181 read with Section 34 of Motor Vehicle Act. After investigation, final report was filed before the Juvenile Board and it was taken on file as STC.No.4 of 2014 (wrongly noted as C.C.No.4 of 2014 in the synopsis as well as in the statement of facts) on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, (Juvenile, Amini), Lakshadweep. The petitioner was appearing through mukthyar. Since the mukthyar did not appear, court below had issued warrant of arrest to the petitioner. He is now studying in Chennai and his examinations will be over only by 05.12.2015. He is prepared to surrender before the court at any time after 05.12.2015 till then he wants the Board to kept in abeyance the warrant issued against him; hence the petition.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.K.R.Sunil and Special Public Prosectuor, Sri.Rashakrishnan, appearing for the respondent.

--3--

Crl.M.C.No.7376 of 2015

4. The counsel for the petitioner submited that he is prepared to surrender after 05.12.2015 since the examinations are scheduled as he is a II year student, he will not get leave and that will affects his education.

5. The application was opposed by the Public Prosecutor.

6. I have gone through the allegations in the petition. The court has got power to issue warrant, if the petitioner, who is the accused did not appear or the person who has been authorised to appear on special authorisation did not appear before the court on the date on which it is posted for appearance of the petitioner. So the order passed by the court below issuing warrant of arrest cannot be said to be illegal.

7. However, considering the fact that the petitioner is a student studying in Chennai and his exams are scheduled and he may not be able to get leave to appear and even if

--4--

Crl.M.C.No.7376 of 2015

he appears, it will affect his educational prospects as he could not appear for the examination, this Court fees that some leniency can be shown in favour of the petitioner. So the petition is disposed of as follows:

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, (Juvenile, Amini), Lakshadweep is directed to keep the coercive steps initiated against the petitioner for his non appearance in STC.No.4 of 2014, pending before that court for a period of one month. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the concerned court on or before 22.12.2015 and move for recalling the warrant and release him on bail, then the court below ie., Chief Judicial Magistrate, (Juvenile Justice Board), Amini, Lakshadweep, is directed to consider and dispose of the application on the date of surrender itself as far as possible, after hearing the Prosecutor of that court in accordance with law. If the petitioner did not surrender as stated above, then the court below is at liberty to proceed
--5--
Crl.M.C.No.7376 of 2015
with the coercive steps initiated for getting the presence of the accused.
With the above direction and observation, the petition is disposed of. Office is directed to communicate this order to the concerned court immediately by fax.
Sd/-
K.RAMAKRISHNAN JUDGE skr