Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Nalamothu Srinivasa Rao, vs State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 4 September, 2020

Author: Ninala Jayasurya

Bench: Ninala Jayasurya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMER,
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
: PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

WRIT PETITION NO: 11716 OF 2020

 

Between:
Nalamothu Srinivasa Rao, S/o Venkateswarlu.
..Petitioner
AND .
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government,
Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
2. District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole,
3. Revenue Divisional Officer, Ongole Revenue Division, Ongole city, Prakasam
istrict.
4. Tahsildar, Santhanuthalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District.
5. Stiriah House Officer, Santhanuthalapadu village and Mandal, Prakasam
istrict.
6. Padamati Thakkellapadu, Rep. by its Executive Authority-Cum-Panchayat

Secretary, Padamati Thakkellapadu Village, Santhanuthalapadu Mandal,
Prakasam District.
. Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to
issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF
MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents in insisting the petitioners to vacate
from landed property of Ac 0 60 cents in new Survey Number 67 situated in Padamati
Thakkellapadu Revenue Village of Santhanuthalapadu Mandal in Prakasam District
under the guise of proceedings in RC Dt 3276/2020 dated 29 06 2020 issued by the 4th
respondent and consequential action of the respondents in taking steps to distributing
the petitioners said land as house sites under NAVARATNALU PEDALANDARIKI! ILLU
SCHEME to the weaker sections as illegal irregular irrational arbitrary without any
authority of law and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently
set aside the notice issued by the 4th respondent to the petitioner landed property in RC
Dt 326/2020 dated 29-06-2020 .

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend
the operation of proceedings issued by the 4th respondent in RC.Dt.326/2020, dated
29.06.2020 and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with
the petitioners possession over his landed property of Ac.0.60 cents in new Survey
Number 67 situated in Padamati Thakkellapadu Revenue Village of Santhanuthalapadu
Mandal in Prakasam District, pending disposal of WP 11716 of 2020, on the file of the
High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit
filed in support thereof and Order of the High Court dated 20.07.2020 made herein and
upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kolluri Arjun Chowdary, Advocate for the Petitioner,
GP for Revenue for Respondent Nos.1 to 4, the Court made the following.

ORDER

Interim orders granted on the earlier occasion are extended for a period of eight (8) weeks.

List the matter after four (4) weeks. Sd/- G. SRINIVASA REDDY, ASSISTANT REGISTR ITTRUE COPY// For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To

4. One CC to Sri Kolluri Arjun Chowdary, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3, One spare copy Tyr HIGH COURT NJSJ DATED: 04.09.2020 LIST AFTER FOUR WEEKS ORDER WP.No.11716 of 2020 STATUS QUO EXTENDED