Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: structural changes in Venkatraman vs Indirani on 7 August, 2014Matching Fragments
3.In I.A.No.487 of 2011, the plaintiff wanted to amend the schedule of the plaint to the effect that the suit pathway is running from east to west instead of south to north as stated in the original plaint and accordingly to correct the boundaries of the suit property. The said applications filed by the petitioner was resisted by the respondents herein.
4.The court below passed separate orders dated 09.06.2011 in both the applications, dismissing the amendment petitions by holding that the plaintiff wanted to change and alter the basic structure of the suit and introduce a new cause of action. The court below has also found that the amendment petitions were filed belatedly.