Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: section 457,380,511 ipc in State vs Gurudev on 19 May, 2025Matching Fragments
Witness was duly cross examined by Ld. APP.
-:FINAL ARGUMENTS:-
9) In the final arguments, Ld. APP submitted that the case has been proved beyond reasonable doubt as the accused was caught red handed at the spot and complainant/PW-1 has also duly identified him in Court as well. No material contradiction has been brought forth by subjecting him to cross examination as well. Ld. APP has thus prayed that the accused be convicted of the offence u/s 457/380/511 IPC
2025.05.19 17:20:29 +0530
18) Thus, in view of the foregoing analysis, this court is of the considered view that the aforesaid deficiencies in the case of the prosecution are sufficient to raise a doubt on the veracity of the entire prosecution case against the accused and the benefit of doubt is extended to him. Prosecution has failed in proving its case beyond reasonable doubt. Accordingly, accused Gurudev stands acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 380/457/511 IPC. Case property be confiscated to the State and be destroyed after expiry of the period of appeal.