Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Mr.P.P.Purushothaman, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 & 2. Ms.Sudharsana Sundar, learned standing counsel takes notice for the respondents 3 & 4. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved against the communication issued by the second respondent dated 28.03.2019, calling upon the http://www.judis.nic.in petitioner to obtain "No Objection Certificate" from the SIPCOT authorities for effecting the sale deed executed by the petitioner in favour of a Company. Consequently, the petitioner seeks for a direction to register and release the documents to be submitted by the petitioner in respect of the lands measuring an extent of 0.07.0 Hectare in Survey No.225/2, 0.59.5 Hectare in Survey No.227/2E, 0.35.5 Hectare comprised in Survey No.226/3B2, 0.73.0 Hectare in Survey No.227/2G1, 0.43.0 Hectare in Survey No.227/2G2 and 1.25.0 Hectare in Survey No.227/2I, totalling an extent of 3.43.0 Hectares, i.e. 8.50 Acres, situated at Nallaganakothapalli Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

http://www.judis.nic.in It is further seen that the said writ petition was disposed of on 19.03.2019 as follows:

"Petitioner has sought for a Declaration, declaring the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (impugned Act, 1997), its Amending Act 2005 along with the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement 2013, (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 2014 dated 05.01.2015 (Impugned Amendment Act 1 of 2015) amending and inserting Section 105 (A) read with Annexed Schedule No.5 to the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (New Central Act 2013) as unconstitutional, illegal, redundant and unworkable and did not save the repugnancy of the state act namely the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Impugned Act 1997) with the New Central Act, 2013 consequentially declare the acquisition proceedings initiated vide Form-A dated 14.11.2016 in Roc.28303/2016/B2 and Na.Ka.28617/2016/B-2 issued by the 5th respondent invoking the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 and the proceedings dated 12.05.2017 issued in Na.Ka.11888/2016/B2 by the 5th respondent, as null and void in so far as petitioner's lands measuring an extent of 0.70.0 hectares comprised in Survey No.225/2, 0.59.5 hectare in Survey No.227/2E, 0.35.5 hectares comprised in Survey No.226/3B2, 0.73.0 hectare in Survey No.227/2G1, 043.0 hectare in Survey No.227/2G2 and 1.25.0 hectare in Survey No.227/2I totalling an extent 3.43.0 hectare i.e.8.50 acres situate at Nallaganakothapalli Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District are concerned.
2. Special Tahsildar(LA), Phase III - Unit-II, SIPCOT, Shoolari Taluk, Krishnagiri District, at http://www.judis.nic.in Paragraph No.9 of the counter affidavit dated 04.03.2019, has stated as hereunder:-
"9. It is submitted that lateron the Managing Director, SIPCOT has decided to exclude certain lands covered under Phase III of proposed acquisition of lands in the above said villages. Accordingly, the petitioner's lands measuring 3.43.0 hectare in S.No.227/2E, 225/2, 226/3B2/ 227/2G1, 227/21 of Nallaganakothapalli Village in Shoolagiri Taluk, were excluded and deleted from the acquisition of lands for SIPCOT. Now the petitioners' lands will not be acquired at present. Hence, this writ petition has become infructuous."

1. The District Registrar, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

2. The Sub Registrar, Shoolagiri, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Managing Director, State Industries Promotion, Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT), No.19 A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600008.