Smt N Bhagya vs Sri J V Gangadhara Char on 15 October, 2009

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt N Bhagya vs Sri J V Gangadhara Char on 15 October, 2009

Bench: B.Sreenivase Gowda

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF QCTQBER, A2509

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.sREENz*.rA$~E ~ V. 

Misceﬂaneous First Appeal N19. 
BETWEEN: A %% V  {V L

1. Smt. N. Bhagya,   
W/0. Sri. 'I'.N. Ramachan' fa, 
Aged about 38 y"e:ai's,   ;   A

2. Sri. T. N. Ra:nach'and'ra,"  *
S/0.    
Aged.abQut _5f1ye:1;'s,  

BoEth_ARe_s'id£n_ g at I'~E.Q'.2'Z -,1 

ZRamkfi~shna lNagar_a, J . P. Nagar,

6131 Pha'se;'Kanak'apiJ;*ra Main Road,

Ba;1_ga10rew.._--' 560 0.7 

 . . A .  ...APPELLAN"11S

(Byfﬁri. ,V.   Kuﬁaar, Adv.)

  

    ' 'Cangadhara Char,

 S1 0.' "Late Vishwamurthachar.
 Aged about 73 years,
'at Jaraganahalli {W
JP. Nagar Post,

"   Bangalore & 560 073.

  E   Sri. A.V. Venkatesh

S/0. Late Govindappa,

@§Z~.<'



Aged about 45 years,

No.27/A, Ramakrishna Nagara,
J .P. Nagar, 611* Phase,
Kanakapura Main Road,
Bangalore -«~ 560 078.

[By Sri. S. K. Jayararriu, Adv. forjCaV'eator R, R'-.72} V

This MFA ﬁled U /Ord:-§r'=<1,8 Ruie 1{r) o_i:=<: agairist the
Order dated 03.10.2008 p'a.s"sed en ._IAﬂNo';,1 in o.s.
No.22?)/O8 on the me of the___)?Q{XEX Adcii__oii_xj.+ Civil and
Sessions Judge, Bangalore, _'di'sn1i's..sing  No.1 ﬁled
U/o.39 Ruie 1 & 2 CPC'for ;   

This appéial. Coming»  hearing, this day, the
Court, deiivei_'ec:i}_th'e fo11owing:"'   = 

 . . ' .       N T

'fhis .:tiiew~"plaintiffs challenging the order

dated ..3.1d§'2Q08 tpgiesieia by the trial Court in rejecting

A .°'E.AV'N0.by tlvidemlolaintiffs under Order 39 Rules 1 and

 to grant an order of temporary

injunction, in their favour.

A  Along with this appeal the plaintiffs filed IA No.1

V'  tinder Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 seeking an order of

temporary injunction restraining the defendants from

. 0* ,



interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment

of the suit property.

3. This Court vide order dated 1o.12.2ocafdiipsdp*ds'¢idres

LA No.1 by directing the parties t_o..rn_aintain"  _ 

respect of the suit property. T"
date. if L if  X h if
4. Sri V.B. Shivakurnar, -Counsei..ap.pearing the
appe11ants--p1aintiffs  if  _ pleadings are

completed, issues. alie the evidence of the

T plaintiffs isfdvoifer d'ei"endants:..:after cross examining the

plaintiffs   failed to lead their evidence

and theirdevidvence vvadsteiken as nil and the case is posted

'"'~.'Afo£':o.jéiYgurn.ents""of-...th'e plaintiffs. Even if the defendants

   application for reopening of the case seeking

 lead their evidence and if it is granted the

 suit  be disposed of within a short period until then

3'V'_A'th.e.i§order of status quo granted by this court on

   3:0. 12.2008 may be continued.

 .

5. Today when the mater was called there is no representation for the respondentsdefendants.

6. Considering the submission made by Counsel appearing for the plaintiff--appella'rit' considering the status quo order' granted VC'oi1rt'=onlT. it 10.12.2008 is in force till ggdateditllistd dispose of the appeal with th'e:follouring. 1] The impugned' ordzf_er d'a.lted'iQ3.l0.2008 passed bythetﬁalCourtr@ecdng§JLNo;1ﬁkxibythe mmmﬂsmﬂ&oma39Rm$ltmd2CHHs granted by this Court on l10.'12'.-2009i'--.d'irecting the parties to maintain "status -.quo"-i_n'"respect of the suit property will force" the disposal of the suit on merit. ' ' iii).

on rne1--'--it' and V. 3 , _ expeditiously as possible.

" g. 'accordingly. Thexltrial Court is directed to dispose of the suit in accordance with law as saw/~ EEEGTEE';

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

Karnataka High Court