Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: assistant programmer in Jagdamba Prasad And 5 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home ... on 21 October, 2022Matching Fragments
1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. With the consent of parties, the case is being disposed of at the admission stage itself.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that petitioners were initially appointed in a government company in Uptron India Ltd. on the post of Technical Assistant on various dates from 1986 to 1988.
4. It has further been stated that the petitioners were subsequently appointed in U.P. Police Computer Centre after facing selection process and were appointed against 154 vacant posts of Sub-Inspector (Ministerial)/Stenographers. Subsequently their services were absorbed in pursuance of the U.P. Computer Staff Non-Gazetted Service Rules, 2002 on the post of Assistant Programmer and are working on the said post till date.