Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2. At the outset, Mr. Vinay Yadav, Senior Panel Counsel for the Respondent, raises a preliminary objection stating that there is an alternate remedy available to Petitioner under Section 32 of the FCRA, whereunder This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 00:12:22 the Petitioner can file a revision petition before the Government. Mr. Yadav places reliance on order dated 23rd February, 2023,2 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court, to buttress his argument.

3. In view of the fact that there is an alternate efficacious remedy available to Petitioner, Dr. Giri seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a revision petition to the Government under Section 32 of the FCRA.

4. In light of the above, leave and liberty, as sought, is granted.

7. With the above directions, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, along with pending application(s).

SANJEEV NARULA, J JULY 18, 2024 d.negi "FCRA"

2