Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: paracetamol in State vs Sarvesh Kumar Gupta (Bail) on 29 November, 2014Matching Fragments
16. PW-9 ASI Raghu Raj Singh recorded disclosure statement of the accused Ex.PW2/E. In his disclosure statement, the accused disclosed that he has kept the remaining charas and material in his room in Bareilly, U.P.
17. Pursuant to the disclosure statement, the accused led PW-9 ASI Raghu Raj Singh to his house in Bareilly, U.P. The accused got smack, paracetamol and sodium recovered from a bag kept under cot in his house in Bareilly, U.P. The recovered smack was weighed and it was found to be 900 gms. PW-9 ASI Raghu Raj Singh drawn 2 samples from 100 gms each from the said smack and converted into cloth parcels. He has given mark B to the remaining charas and mark B-1 and mark B-2 to the sample parcels.
18. The weight of the paracetamol was found to be 3.500 k.gms. PW-9 ASI Raghu Raj Singh drawn two samples of 200 gms. each therefrom and converted the remaining paracetamol and the samples into cloth parcels which were given mark C and C-1 and C-2 respectively. He recovered four packets of sodium from a bag and the gross weight thereof was 19.300 k.gms. He drawn four samples of 100 gms. each of the said four packets and converted them into cloth parcels which were marked as mark D and D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4 respectively. He recovered two cloth pieces, one white colour and grey colour, used for cleaning of smack and converted them into a cloth parcel which was given mark E-1. He sealed all the parcels with his seal having impression 'JPS'. Seal after use was handed over to PW-3 Ct. Upender. He seized all the cloth parcels including sample parcels vide seizure memo Ex.PW2/F.
26. Material circumstances emerging in prosecution evidence against the accused were put U/sec. 313 Cr.P.C.FIR No. 135/2009 State Vs. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta Page No. 7/24
27. According to the accused, no smack was recovered from his possession. He stated that no smack, sodium or paracetamol was recovered from his residence. He stated that WagonR car was not recovered at his instance.
28. According to the accused, he is a permanent resident of Vijay Nagar Colony, District Badaun, U.P. He is running a shop there. He was lifted from his residence and framed in this case. He stated that no recovery was effected from his possession and the alleged contraband was planted upon him. The entire writing work was done in the police station.