Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

"(a) Quash and set aside impugned order No.HRM/PRP/EC/2014/1686 dated 08.04.2015.
(b) Declare the ACR Grading of the applicant for the period 2000-01, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 malafide, thus unlawful and thereafter, quash and set aside the adverse remarks.
(c) Direct the respondents to consider the ACR of the applicant for 1998-99 and 1999-2000 instead for 2001-01 since applicant was due for promotion in 1999-2000 whereas his junior had became eligible one year later and no separate panel placing the select panel of the earlier year 1999-2000 panel above the next year panel of 2000-01 was made.

07 and 2007-08 and direct the respondent No.2 to consequently grant applicant PRP w.e.f. 05.03.2009 and next promotion to the post of Deputy Manager (Finance) w.e.f. 5.3.2009 the date his junior (Respondent No.3) was promoted.

(g) Direct the respondents to grant the promotion to the post of Manager (Finance) in the DPC of 2014-15 in which his junior R-3 has been promoted.

(h) Direct the respondents grant interest @12% per annum to the pay fixation arrears on promotion from the date of his juniors.

(i) Pass any other order as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

(j) Allow cost in favour of the applicant."

3. The applicant is not only seeking quashing and setting aside of the grading given to him in the ACRs but to consider other ACRs, restoring his seniority, promoting him in the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) of 2006-07 as Assistant Manager (Finance), and also after quashing and setting aside the ACRs, grant him Performance Related Promotion (PRP) w.e.f. 05.03.2009 Item No.37 by promoting him as Deputy Manager (Finance) with effect from the said date; and further promotion as Manager (Finance) in the DPC of 2014-15, etc. His primary grievance is relating to the ACR grading for the above mentioned periods.

7. This is the second round of litigation. The applicant had earlier filed O.A. No.4483/2011 before this Tribunal. Vide order dated 05.12.2014, the said O.A. was disposed of directing respondent No.2 to pass a fresh order on the representation made by the applicant on 04/06.05.2011 regarding grant of pension under PRP Scheme of 2009 & Item No.37 against grading in the ACRs for 2000-01, 2005-06, 2006- 07, 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10. The applicant is seeking similar relief yet again by filing the instant O.A. In paragraph 8 (f) of O.A., the subject matter of ACR upgradation for 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08 has been indicated. Be that as it may, it is observed that the respondents have passed a detailed order dated 08.04.2015, which has dealt with the issues raised by the applicant in his representation at length and in this recent order passed, explanations have been given with regard to non-extension of PRP Scheme, 2009 to the applicant and also about his grading in the ACRs of the years 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. The applicant is seeking quashing of this order passed in terms of the Tribunal's order dated 05.12.2014 and practically seeking the same reliefs, which he had sought in the earlier O.A. He has since retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation.