Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: rateable distribution in Dr Girish Chandra Chaturvedi vs Canara Bank Andors (2025:Rj-Jp:3828) on 28 January, 2025Matching Fragments
Rule 89 (2) stipulates that in case the person had applied under Rule 90 for setting aside of the sale, application under Rule 89 cannot be prosecuted unless the application under Rule 90 is withdrawn.
As per Rule 89 (3) the judgment debtor is liable to pay costs and interest not covered by proclamation of the sale.
7. The decree holder or purchaser or a person entitled to the share in rateable distribution of the assets or whose interests are affected may apply under Rule 90 for setting aside of the sale in pursuance to execution, on the ground of material irregularity or fraud in publication or conducting the sale.