Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: npcil in Atul G Shah vs Nuclear Power Corporation Of India on 30 August, 2017Matching Fragments
Facts:
1. The appellant filed RTI application dated 09.02.2016 seeking information on 5 points regarding: "copy of complete noting and correspondence with his request cum application dated 15.09.2015, for hiring a leased accommodation in Ahmedabad; name of NPCIL employees who have been so far extended facility of hired accommodation at NPCIL's cost as per office order no. NPCIL/HRP/11(26)/2009/396"; etc.
2. The CPIO responded on 09.03.2016. The appellant filed first appeal dated 21.03.2016 with First Appellate Authority (FAA). The response of FAA is not on record. The appellant filed second appeal on 27.09.2016 before the Commission on the ground that information should be provided to him.
7. During the hearing, the respondent apprised the Commission that similar matter has already been heard by the Commission in Appeal No. CIC/YA/A/2016/902019 dated 17.02.2017 titled as Mr. Atul Kumar G Vs. CPIO, NPCIL, in which the Commission had directed the respondent to furnish the information to the appellant. The respondent stated that in compliance of the said order, on 14.03.2017, complete information was furnished to the appellant.
Discussion/ observation:
8. The action/steps taken by the respondent in dealing with the RTI application is satisfactory, as information has already been furnished to the appellant. No case for penalty was made out by the appellant.