Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

D. That both the co-owners/landlords of the said property have received the sale consideration amount after the sale of the property bearing No. J-120, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi.
E. That Shri D.L. Chopra had purchased the property bearing No. J-12/ 39 Rajouri Garden, New Delhi.
F. That Shri K.C. Chopra had received the sale proceeds in respect of his share of the property and had purchased the property bearing No. D-36A Rajouri Garden, New Delhi, in the name of defendant No. 1 Smt. Adarsh Bhalla, his daughter, Benami.
I. That Smt. Adarsh Bhalla, defendant No. 1 was earlier residing and settled at Kota, Rajasthan at the time of execution of the sale deed in the year 1963 where her husband was employed in teaching job.
J. That Smt. Adarsh Bhalla was not earning anything at the time of the execution of sale deed dated 22.4.63 and she was not assessed to Income Tax also. That the defendant No. 1 had also admitted that she was not assessed to Income Tax and she was not earning, in her statement given to the Income Tax Authorities in an income tax proceeding.
K. That Smt. Adarsh Bhalla, defendant No. 1 was not having any bank account with Punjab National Bank, Regal Building, Connaught Circus, New Delhi in the year 1963 at the time of the execution of sale deed dated 22.4.63.
L. That late K.C. Chopra and the present plaintiff were having bank accounts in Punjab National Bank, Regal Building. Connaught Circles, New Delhi, in the year 1963."

3. There is nothing in the proposed amendment which can possibly be said to introduce either a new cause of action or to change the nature of the suit or the controversy therein. All that the amendment aims at is to assert that the funds for the purchase of the suit property did in fact flow from the father of the parties late Lt. Col. K.C. Chopra. There is, in that view, no justifiable reason to decline the amendment prayed for.