Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

the counterfeit notes and the implements from the house No. XXIV/342. Thus, the counsel submitted that the trial court miserably failed to consider the above vital aspect and the drawback of the prosecution case and erroneously found that the prosecution has succeeded in proving its case against the accused under Section 489C and 489D. Thus, according to the counsel, the appellants/accused are entitled to get a clear acquittal.

17. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor Sri.P.M.Saneer, submitted that the available evidence and materials supported by the evidence of Pws.1 to 3 show that Mos.1 to 14 were recovered from the physical possession of accused No.1 and he has no explanation as to how the said counterfeit notes came into his possession and therefore, according to the learned Public Prosecutor, the findings of the court below against the first accused are absolutely correct and such finding is supported by the evidence and materials on record. It is the further submission of  :-21-: