Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Article 256 in Additional District Magistrate, ... vs Shivakant Shukla on 28 April, 1976Matching Fragments
79. Reference to Articles 256, 265 and 361 was made by the respondents to show that Article 21 is not the repository of rights to life and liberty. These references are irrelevant. Article 256 does not confer any right on any person. It deals with relations between the Union and the State. Article 265 has nothing to do with the right to personal liberty. Article 361(3) refers to the issue of a process from any court which is a judicial act and not any Executive action. In any event, these Articles have no relevance in the present appeals.