Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: mhada in Chief Officer, Nagpur Housing & Area ... vs Dr. Virendra Ratansing Rathod on 31 December, 2025Matching Fragments
iii.The O.P.Nos. 1&2 shall also pay to the complainant interest at the rate of 15% p.a. over the amount of Rs. 46,04,871/- from date 30/09/2013 till the delivery of the possession of the flat along with sale deed to the complainant.
iv.The O.P.Nos. 1&2 shall also obtain necessary statutory sanction, permission & certificate from the various government departments or authories, within six months from today.
v The O.P.Nos. 1&2 shall also provide all facilities and amenities to the said project called as MHADA CITY as per contract entered between them and OP No. 3 of which copy is filed on record vi The O.P. Nos. 1&2 also jointly and severally shall pay to the complainant compensation of Rs. 50,000/- for physical and mental harassment and litigation cost of Rs. 25,000/-.
3. Opposite parties are directed to handover to complainant, possession of 3 bhk flat no. B/1003 in building no. 1 in MHADA City, Nagpur as described in complainant alongwith occupancy certificate and to execute sale deed in respect of the same.
4. The expenses for registration of sale deed and stamp duty and any other mandatory charges shall be borne by complainant.
5. Opposite parties are directed to pay to complainant interest @ 9% p.a. on the amount of Rs.42,97.962/- for the period from 1.3.2015 till handing over possession/execution of sale deed whichever is earlier.
The appellants and respondents are hereinafter referred to as the complainant/opposite party as appearing in the complaint for sake of convenience.
FA NO.440 OF 2018 AND FA NO.2334 OF 2018
4. The facts fall within a narrow compass. CC No. 17/2013 was preferred by Mrs. Usha Suresh Thakare against Nagpur Housing & Area Development Board (A MHADA Unit)/OP-1, Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority/OP-2, IVARCL Infrastructure & Project Ltd./OP-3 and Mitali Co-operative Housing Society/OP-4.
OP-1 and OP-2 are state-owned Housing Board formed by the State Government of Maharashtra; OP-3 is a Private Limited Company employed as a Contractor by OP-1 & OP-2 and OP-4 is the Cooperative Housing Society formed by the allottees.
5. As per the case of complainant, OP-2 purchased land by registered sale deed on 30.09.2003 and OP-1 & OP-2 launched the scheme called as MHADA City. Pursuant to advertisement made on behalf of OP-1 & 2 application for allotment of 3 BHK flats was made by the complainant whereupon flat No. D-1008 in Building No. 0-1, was allotted. The construction of flats was handed over by OP-1 & 2 to OP-3 and the project was proposed to have 320 flats to be completed in 24 months from 16.12.2010 to 15.12.2012. An amount of Rs.46,04,871/- was paid by the complainant to OP-1 as demanded from time to time. However, OP-3 failed to complete the construction of flats within stipulated period. Illegal extensions for construction are alleged to have been granted by OP-1 and OP-2 to OP-3 from time to time till 31.03.2015 and since only 70% of the project was completed, Fine/penalty was also imposed on OP-3.