Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: notarised in Smt. Harjeet Kaur W/O Sh. Daljeet Singh vs Sh. Jeet Lal Sachdeva on 28 July, 2021Matching Fragments
PW1/2), (c) notarised Will (Ex. PW1/3), (d) notarised Affidavit (Ex. PW1/4), (e) notarised Receipt of Rs. 25,10,000/ (Ex. PW1/5), and (f) notarised Possession Letter (Ex. PW1/6). The vendor Ms. Santosh Rani handed over possession of ground floor of the aforesaid property to plaintiff. Defendant was in possession of the first floor and the vendor Ms. Santosh Rani sought some time to hand over its possession to the plaintiff. Plaintiff asked the defendant to vacate, but to no avail. He instead threatened to create third party interest. Plaintiff's legal notice dt. 30.09.2015 (Mark A) to the defendant was of no avail. On these averments, plaintiff seeks the following reliefs:
iii) that on 02.09.2015 she (plaintiff) bought back the aforesaid property bearing no. 2/107, Geeta Colony, Delhi from Ms. Santosh Rani vide registered Agreement to Sell and Purchase (Ex. PW1/1 :
Ex. PW3/2), registered General Power of Attorney (Ex. PW1/2), notarised Will (Ex. PW1/3), notarised Affidavit (Ex. PW1/4), MURARI PRASAD SINGH PRASAD No.7, Karkardooma SINGH Courts, Delhi Date: 2021.07.28 12:42:38 +0530 notarised Receipt of Rs. 25,10,000/ (Ex. PW1/5) and notarised Possession Letter (Ex. PW1/6).
PW1/10) and Receipt of Rs. 9,20,000/ transferred the property in favour of Santosh Rani.
Plaintiff Harjeet Kaur On 02.09.2015 Santosh Rani vide registered Agreement to Sell and Purchase (Ex. PW1/1 : Ex. PW3/2), registered General Power of Attorney (Ex. PW1/2), notarised Will (Ex. PW1/3), notarised Affidavit (Ex. PW1/4), notarised Receipt of Rs. 25,10,000/ (Ex.
PW1/5), and notarised Possession Letter (Ex. PW1/6) transferred the property in favour of plaintiff Harjeet Kaur.
13. Parties to the lis do not dispute that the property in question vested in late Tola Ram Sachdeva. In fact, the defendant Jeet Lal Sachdeva in his crossexamination says, "It is correct that originally the entire property bearing no. 2/107, Geeta Colony, belonged to my late father Sh. Tola Ram, MURARI PRASAD SINGH PRASAD No.7, Karkardooma SINGH Courts, Delhi Date: 2021.07.28 12:47:51 +0530 who died in the year 1981." It is also not disputed that after the demise of Tola Ram Sachdeva, his wife Chitro Bai and his seven children, including the defendant herein, succeeded to his estate.
24. We now come to the last transaction in plaintiff's chain, which is the one between Ms. Santosh Rani wife of R. L. Madan and herself (plaintiff Harjeet Kaur). On 02.09.2015 Ms. Santosh Rani vide registered Agreement to Sell and Purchase (Ex. PW1/1 : Ex. PW3/2), registered General Power of Attorney (Ex. PW1/2), notarised Will (Ex. PW1/3), notarised Affidavit (Ex. PW1/4), notarised Receipt of Rs. 25,10,000/ (Ex. PW1/5), and notarised Possession Letter (Ex. PW1/6) transferred the property in question in favour of plaintiff Harjeet Kaur. Plaintiff Harjeet Kaur (PW1) in her evidence deposed about execution of these documents in her favor by Ms. Santosh Rani. PW2 Daljeet Singh is a witness to all these documents, except the notarised Affidavit (Ex. PW1/4). It is to be noted that two of these documents, namely, the Agreement to Sell and Purchase (Ex. PW1/1 : Ex. PW3/2) and the General Power of Attorney (Ex. PW1/2), are duly registered. That apart, it is not shown to this court that either the vendor (Ms. Santosh Rani) or the vendee (plaintiff Harjeet Kaur) had ever challenged or made any complaint against execution of these documents. It is this court's view, on preponderance of probabilities, that Ms. Santosh Rani had transferred the property in question to plaintiff Harjeet Kaur for a valuable consideration. As per the written text of these documents, what MURARI Location: Court PRASAD Karkardooma SINGH Courts, Delhi Date: