Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: s.319 in Maddipatta Govindaiah Naidu And Ors. vs Yelakaluri Kamalamma And Anr. on 15 March, 1984Matching Fragments
13. The learned counsel for the petitioner referred to an unreported decision of this court in Musara Narayana Reddy v. Kanakanti Mal Reddy 1976 (2) APLJ 385 : (1977 Cri LJ 1473) wherein the learned Judge held that the non-examination by the Magistrate under S. 202(2), Cr.P.C., in a case triable by the Court of Session of the witnesses cited by the complainant, but subsequently given up, does not vitiate the proceedings. Another decision referred to by the learned counsel is Dr. S. S. Khanna v. Chief Secretary, Patna . In that case the Supreme Court was concerned with the question whether the proceedings under S. 319, Cr.P.C., can be initiated against a person even after enquiry under S. 202, Cr.P.C., and dismissal of the complaint under S. 203, Cr.P.C. The two cases relied upon by the learned counsel do not relate to the question falling for consideration in this case.