Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: EIPR in State By S.J.Park Police Station vs Persons Were Selling The Same To The ... on 30 October, 2015Matching Fragments
This court did not found guilt of accused Nos.1 to 4 for the offences under section 51(B), (1), 63, Copy Right Act 1957 and Sec.420 of IPC.
Consequently, acting under Sec.248 (1) of Cr.P.C., the accused Nos.1 to 4 are acquitted for the above-referred offences.
Their bail bonds and surety bonds stand cancelled.
Office to return M.O.1 to C.W.2 R.Stefen Raj the investigator of EIPR Company after obtaining necessary documents about his authorization by the Samsung Company as on the date of return after appeal period is over.
ORDER This court did not found guilt of accused Nos.1 to 4 for the offences under section 51(B), (1), 63, Copy Right Act 1957 and Sec.420 of IPC.
Consequently, acting under Sec.248 (1) of Cr.P.C., the accused Nos.1 to 4 are acquitted for the above-referred offences.
Their bail bonds and surety bonds stand cancelled.
Office to return M.O.1 to C.W.2 R.Stefen Raj the investigator of EIPR Company after obtaining necessary documents about his authorization by the Samsung Company as on the date of return after appeal period is over.