Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: ancient document in D.V. Satyanarayana Raju, vs M/S. Kmr Estates And Building Pvt. Ltd., on 27 June, 2024Matching Fragments
It is submitted that appellants do not have any locus to seek a decree to seek cancellation of sale deed dated 17.10.1978 i.e., Ex.B1, as null and void.
12. The registered sale deed dated 17-10-1978 i.e., Ex.B1 which is sought to be canceled is an ancient document and therefore gives rise to a statutory presumption. The said Late.D.Chaganlal, executed the Registered Sale Deed dated 17- 10-1978 bearing Document No. 8513 of 1982, i.e., Ex.B1 in favour of Sri.D.Ramachandra Raju. Admittedly, this Sale Deed was executed on 17- 10-1978. The suit is filed on 21-11-2012. It is therefore submitted that by the date of filing of the suit the said sale deed is more than 34 years old. In this regard it is submitted that the Sale Deed under challenge is an ancient document as per Section 90 of Evidence Act and presumption is available with regard to its due execution, registration. It is also held in 2014(2) ALT 245;