Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: cvc in Mr.Umapathi S vs State Bank Of India on 8 November, 2010Matching Fragments
Supplied Whether
Item on Inspection is to Information held
Nos Information sought Remarks be allowed. at
Info i/r of his complaint against Mr S K Sing Certified copy of complaint Register at No 1 Vigilance Dept. Not available No Not Applicable C/ copy of letter of SBI, CC, Mumbai No addressed to SBI LHO Ahmedabad 2 ordering investigation along with Outward Register. Not available No Not Applicable Date of receipt of above letter by 24.04.2010 3 Ahmedabad centre with Inward reg. Available Yes LHO, Ahmedabad C/ copy of letter from Vig Dept, Ahd 24.04.2010 4 appointing investigating officer (IO) Available Yes LHO, Ahmedabad C/copy of all correspondence 24.04.2010 between LHO Ahmedabad & CC 5 Mumbai Available Yes LHO, Ahmedabad C/copy of investigation report dated 24.04.2010 6 27.10.2009 with all docs, witness etc Available Yes LHO, Ahmedabad C/copy of format for investigation 24.04.2010 officer to submit report as per CVC 7 guidelines Available Yes LHO, Ahmedabad Date & Place of investigation 24.04.2010 conducted & no. of days investigation 8 officer was out of HQ Available Yes LHO, Ahmedabad 9 C/copy of BioData of Shri S K Sing. Not available No No Not Applicable C/copy of Assurance memo of CVO to No 10 CVC Not available No Not Applicable 11 C/copy of explanation of Shri S K Sing Not available No No Not Applicable Umapathi S. Vs SBI Bangalore- 47 appeals-cum-complaints Page 2 of 49 Details of expenses incurred towards No 12 investigation with copies of bills. Not available No Not Applicable Name & Designation of authority to 24.04.2010 13 whom the report is submitted. Available Yes CC Mumbai Remarks of DGM(Vig), LHO, No Ahmedabad before sending it to CVO 14 of CC, Mumbai Not available No Not Applicable Date of receipt of Investigating report No by CVO, CC Mumbai with Inward 15 register Not available No Not Applicable Details of discussion of CVO with No higher authorities on Investigation 16 Report. Not available No Not Applicable Details of authority who take view on No 17 the Investigation Report Not available No Not Applicable C/copy of all letters/file noting of CVO No 18 SBI to CVO, SBBJ Not available No Not Applicable Name & Designation of authority in No SBI, who took the decision to send it 19 to SBBJ Not available No Not Applicable C/copy of all letters between SBI,CC No and CVC from date of receipt of 20 complaint. Not available No Not Applicable C/copy of all letters between SBI and No 21 SBBJ. Not available No Not Applicable CIC/AT/A/2010/000513; Date of RTIapplication: 15.02.2010 (Ref. No. RTI/SBI/28) Respondents' statement:
Item Information sought Remarks Supplied Whether No. On Inspection is to be Information held at allowed.
Info i/r of investigation & other details of his complaint against Sri.P Kanther C/copy of letter of AGM(adm) addressed to Sri Vijayendrachar 1 ordering for investigation Available 26.04.2010 Yes LHO Bangalore Date of receipt of the above order by 2 Sri Vijayendrachar. Available 26.04.2010 Yes LHO Bangalore C/copy of investigation report dated 30.06.2009 along with statement of 3 witnesses Available 26.04.2010 Yes LHO Bangalore C/copy of 'Format for Investigation 4 Officer' i/r of above complaint Available 26.04.2010 Yes LHO Bangalore Date & Place of investigation conducted & no of days investigation 5 officer was out of br Available 26.04.2010 Yes LHO Bangalore BioData of suspected officials in the 6 complaint Available 26.04.2010 Yes LHO Bangalore C/copy of letter exchanged between No Not Applicable 7 Investigating officer and SBI Not available No C/copy of explanation obtained from No No Not Applicable 8 Sri P Kanther Not available C/ copy of explanation obtained from No No Not Applicable 9 Smt Usha Jacob Not available TA/HA/Conveyance claimed by No No Not Applicable 10 Investigation officer Not available Name & designation of authority in SBI to whom investigation report was 11 submitted Available 26.04.2010 Yes LHO Bangalore 12 Remarks/comments by DGM (Vig) at Not No Not Applicable Umapathi S. Vs SBI Bangalore- 47 appeals-cum-complaints Page 14 of 49 LHO Bangalore Available No Date of receipt of investigation report Not No Not Applicable 13 by CVO & Mail Inward Register Available No Details of discussions between CVO Not No Not Applicable 14 and higher authorities, if any. Available No Details of competent authority who is authorized to take view on Information sought is vague & not 15 investigation report Not available No specific Whether investigation report i/r of Sri 16 P Kanther was sent to SBBJ. Not available No do Details of jurisdiction of the do disciplinary authority in case of Sri P 17 Kanther Not available No 18 Present status of the complaint Not available No do Details of investigation report referred do 19 to CVC Not available No C/copies of letters exchanged do 20 between CVO and CVC Not available No C/copies of letters exchanged do 21 between SBI and SBBJ Not available No Reason for not informing the status of do 22 complaint to the appellant Not available No CIC/AT/A/2010/000528; Date of RTIapplication: 22.03.2010 (Ref. No. RTI/SBI/62) Respondents' statement:
Whether Inspection is Item Supplied to be Information held No. Information sought Remarks on allowed. at Information i/r of Vigilance Dept. & reports to be submitted to CVC C/copies of Monthly reports of CVO to the 1 CVC from March 2009 to March, 2010 Available No Yes CC Mumbai C/copies of Annual Report of CVO to the 2 CVC for the year 2009 Available No Yes CC Mumbai C/copies of all circulars issued by the 3 Vigilance Dept from 01.01.2009 till date Available No Yes CC Mumbai C/copy of up to date circulars i/r of scrutiny of annual property returns of sup 4 staff Available 07.05.2010 Yes CC Mumbai Umapathi S. Vs SBI Bangalore- 47 appeals-cum-complaints Page 20 of 49 Specimen copy of Annual property return 5 to be submitted by sup staff Available 07.05.2010 Yes CC Mumbai CIC/AT/A/2010/000534; Date of RTIapplication: 06.04.2010 (Ref. No. RTI/SBI/78) Respondents' statement:
Supplied Whether
on Inspection is
Item to be Informati
No. Information sought Remarks allowed on held at
Info i/r of implementation of CVC circular no.8(1)(g)/99(4) dated 12.03.1999 Steps taken to display Notice Board as per CVC LHO, 1 circular in SBI, LHO Bangalore Available 22.08.2009 Yes Bangalore C/copies of instructions/orders/circulars received LHO, 2 from CC, Mumbai for implementation Available 22.08.2009 Yes Bangalore Has LHO displayed the notice board, if yes, provide details of place, medium & format of LHO, 3 display Available 22.08.2009 Yes Bangalore 4 Name, designation of authority responsible for Available 22.08.2009 Yes LHO, Umapathi S. Vs SBI Bangalore- 47 appeals-cum-complaints Page 39 of 49 publishing such notice boards in all its offices Bangalore Has LHO taken steps to put up such notice boards in all its offices, if yes, supply copies of LHO, 5 orders Available 22.08.2009 Yes Bangalore Name of the branches/offices that have complied/not complied with the above LHO, 6 requirements. Available 22.08.2009 Yes Bangalore Total expenses incurred for display of boards and Not Not 7 details of payment made by the Bank Available No No Applicable Role of Vigilance Dept at LHO, Bangalore in this Not Not 8 regard and details of action taken by the Dept. Available No No Applicable CIC/SM/A/2009/2014AT;Date of RTIapplication: 03.08.2009 (Ref. No. RTI/SBI/3) Respondents' statement: