Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: KEC in Kec International Limited & Another vs Union Of India & Others on 8 July, 2009Matching Fragments
"6. However, it appears that the line items of SoR Addendum 4.2 dated 06/09/2008 (Revised SoR) for which M/S ACME Tele Power Ltd. has not quoted any price have not been loaded by the highest price quoted by any other bidder as per sub clause 46.2(vii)(a). We believe that the application of procedures as mentioned in Para 46 in respect of M/s ACME would have resulted in its bid being higher than KEC International Ltd. in the zone."
The petitioner company confirmed its understanding of addendum 4.2 at the earliest available opportunity and put BSNL on notice. Whether it was because BSNL did not wish to engage in greater detail with a less successful bidder or whether BSNL altogether missed the point, it dealt with such assertion in the following cryptic manner in its response of May 8, 2009: