Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: paracetamol in State Of Rajasthan vs Jainudeen Shekh And Anr on 25 August, 2015Matching Fragments
3. The accused persons denied the charges and stated in their statement under Section 313 CrPC that they had been falsely implicated.
4. The prosecution in order to establish the charges, examined six witnesses. Be it noted, the sample that was sent for examination to the Forensic Science Laboratory on 8.11.2011, chemical analysis thereof was done on 9.9.2013 and the report was submitted to the court on 28.9.2013 and it was exhibited as Exhibit P-11. The said document revealed that the sample contained “caffeine” and “paracetamol” and it did not contain Diacetylmorphine (heroine) or alkaloid of “Afeem” (Opium). As the report indicated that the said items were not covered under the category of intoxicant under NDPS Act, the trial court came to the conclusion that the charges were not established in any manner.