Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: case studies in Samir Sardana vs Indian Bank on 8 November, 2021Matching Fragments
(xii) Credit insurance • PIO to confirm the aggregate credit insurance cover taken by the Bank w.r.t the o/s MUDRA loans as at March 31, 2019
(xiii) Case studies and sample credit cases • PIO to confirm that the Bank has made case studies on varied enterprise business models for each district or other geography of India, along with tie ups with suppliers, vendors, training companies and video and audio kits for the same o If Yes, PIO to confirm that all the said data is in e-format o If Yes, PIO to confirm that all the said data is available on the web on an authenticated source of the GOI.
(xxv) The information sought by you is not available (xxvi) The information sought by you is not related to our bank.
(xxvii) The information sought by you is not related to our bank.
(xxviii) No (xxix) Total No. of Insurance cover A/c Covered amount (in Cr.) 127964 2394.52
(xxx) No such case study conducted by our bank".
Page 14 of 295. The complainant and Shri Sandeep Ghosal, DGM & CPIO and Ms. Sujata, Sr. Manager, Indian Bank (earlier Allahabad Bank) Chennai attended the hearing through video conference.