Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

[32] It would be appropriate to note at this stage that the affected party in that case was Enforcement Director. There is nothing on record that till date any legal remedy has been availed against the order passed by the Special Judge. As per the comments received from the Special Judge, three accused (including one alleged to be in touch with Special Judge) in the case titled as "ED v. M/s Future Maker Life Care Pvt. Ltd. were granted interim regular bail on 23.3.2021 by his predecessor. The Special Judge after getting the reply from the Enforcement Director had only confirmed the interim bail. No adverse inference can be drawn against the Special Judge on the ground that he made no comments on the complaint filed against him. He has put forth his version in his comments by stating that his predecessor granted the interim bail which was confirmed by him. [33] The allegations of proximity of the respondent No. 2 with the Special Judge is based on hear-say like, that the judgment was drafted by the respondent No. 2 on 7.8.2021 or on unrelated incident in another case where the senior counsel appearing for the accused objected to the presence of the respondent No. 2 in the court and he was asked to sit on the chairs meant for the lawyers.