Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

11. P.W.4 stated that he took further investigation from PW.1 and received the F.S.L report and submitted charge sheet. In his cross examination denied that he has falsely filed charge sheet. P.W.3 F.S.L officer stated that on 19.12.2011 he opened the sample articles and conducted various tests on the sample articles and issued report Ex.P15 and opined that the sample articles responded positive for presence of diacetyl morphine (brown sugar) along with Alfrazolam, caffeine and Paracetamol. In his cross examination denied that he has not personally conducted the tests. As per testimony of P.W.3 sample articles may respond positive for the presence of diacetyl morphine (brown sugar) along with Alfrazolam, caffeine and Paracetamol but the said sample articles are seized from the possession of the accused is not proved as none of the panch witnesses examined by the prosecution in spite of sufficient opportunity was given. He admits that caffeine and Paracetamol are medicines available in the market. So opinion of P.W3 is also not helpful to the case of the prosecution in the absence of proving seizure.