Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: IASE in Perisetla Venkateswara Rao, vs Kranthi Educational Society, on 10 June, 2013Matching Fragments
(Per Smt. M. Shreesha, Member) ***
1) Aggrieved by the order in CC No. 45/2010 on the file of Dist. Forum, Tirupathi, the complainant preferred this appeal.
2) The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant believing the paper advertisement issued by Ops 1 & 2 and believing their version that Op1 is an authorized study center of IASE Deemed University, Rajasthan, the complainant joined for two year M.Tech (E&C) course having four semesters by paying admission fee of Rs. 12,000/- and Rs. 1,000/-
towards examination fee on 9.8.2004 and 10.11.2004 respectively. The complainant submits that all of a sudden the Govt. of A.P. black listed the said IASE Deemed University, Rajasthan and refused to recognize any educational certificates issued by the said university. Immediately, he approached Op2 who promised to provide admission for M.Tech (E&C) in another university for which Op2 demanded Rs. 50,000/-. Accordingly, he paid Rs. 50,000/- by way of cheques on 4.2.2006 which were acknowledged by Op2 on a letter-head. When he demanded for receipts, Op2 executed a promissory note for Rs. 66,000/- on 4.2.2006 for the entire amount received from the complainant towards M.Tech (E&C) course. When the complainant demanded for conducting examinations for the 1st year two semesters, Op2 postponed on one pretext or the other and conducted the examinations for 2nd year 3rd and 4th semesters through an unknown university viz., Vinayaka Missions University, Salem, Tamil Nadu (Op3) which also issued memorandum of marks for 4th semester dt. 8.5.2007. The complainant suspected the genuineness of the marks memo issued by Op2.
66,000/- with interest @ 24% p.a., together with compensation and costs.
3) Ops 1 & 2 filed written version denying the allegations made by the complainant. Op2 submitted that he is running Kranthi Educational Society, a study center affiliated to IASE University of Rajasthan. They admit that the complainant approached them in the year 2004 to join M.Tech course of IASE University and sought proper coaching and guidance for which he paid Rs. 12,000/- towards coaching and study material. All of a sudden the complainant approached Ops 1 & 2 and demanded refund of amount on the ground that A.P. Govt. black listed the IASE University, and took back the said amount. Again the complainant approached the Op1 in the year 2006 stating that he joined in two year M.Tech (E&C) consisting of four semesters in Vinayaka Mission University (Op3) and sought for coaching and study material. Op2 submits that the complainant appeared for two semesters only and got the provisional certificate issued by Vinayaka Mission University (Op3). Ops 1 & 2 submit that they are no way concerned with the conducting of examinations, issuance of provisional certificates and marks memo etc. The complainant did not attend the remaining semester examinations to complete the course. The provisional certificate and the marks memo issued by Op3 to the complainant are genuine and not bogus or fake as alleged by the complainant. In order to make unlawful gain, the complainant created a forged and concocted promissory note. There is no deficiency of service on their behalf as they provided the necessary coaching and study material to the complainant and they have nothing to do with the conducting of examinations, issuance of marks memo and provisional certificate etc. They submit that they purely come under the domain of concerned universities.
10) It is not in dispute that the appellant/complainant studied for the 1st year two semesters in the IASE Deemed University for M.Tech course and then migrated to Op3 university for the last two semesters. It is also not in dispute that the complainant gave an affidavit to Op3 for migration and joined in Op3 university. Ex. A5 is the statement of marks given by Op3 university in May, 2007. Ex. A6 is the provisional certificate issued by Op3 for the same year in Sept, 2007. It is the appellant/complainants case that the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh blacklisted the IASE Deemed University, Rajasthan, and refused to recognize through its G.O. The complainant has filed paper publication stating that the said university is black listed. He also filed university list issued by the Ministry of Human Resources and Development (HRD) wherein deemed status awarded to the universities in the country were withdrawn. In this list Vinayaka Missions University, Salem, Tamil Nadu (Op3) stood at Sl. No.