Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: case studies in Rajaperumal M vs Csir Hqrs.,New Delhi on 22 July, 2021Matching Fragments
First Appellate Authority order : Not on record Second Appeal Filed on : 22/07/2019 Date of Hearing : 22/07/2021 Date of Decision : 22/07/2021 The following were present:
Appellant: Present over phone Respondent: Ajay Kumar Thakur, Administrative Officer and CPIO, present over phone Information Sought:
The appellant has sought the following information:
1. Whether the case study submitted by the appellant in his PhD thesis has been accepted or not. Provide the reasons for acceptance or denial of the case study.
2. Whether the case study submitted by the appellant contains any violation of CSIR or AcSIR rules. lf yes, provide the complete details of the section of CSIR or AcSIR rules, which has been violated.
3. Whether the DAC member knows the fact that information pertaining to the list of instrument used or operated by Rajaperumal M is not available at CSIR NCL Pune.
4. And other related information.
Grounds for Second Appeal The CPIO has not provided the satisfactory information. Submissions made by Appellant and Respondent during Hearing: