Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: structural changes in High Court Of Delhi & Anr vs A.K. Mahajan & Ors on 15 May, 2009Matching Fragments
(ii) That at the stage of the argument, though the Rule was extensively amended, the challenge was restricted only to the retrospective operation of the Rule, so amended.
The other changed structure of the Rule was not assailed by the writ petitioners.
8
7. This means that what falls for our consideration is only the effect of retrospective operation of the amendment.
8. We have already pointed out the original Rule No. 7 in the opening paragraphs of this judgment. We will point out now as to what the amendment was and for that purpose, we will quote the Original Rule No. 7, as amended, from Schedule II:-