Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

seeking review.

The date of judgment, which has been recorded as "25/04/2017" appears to be a clerical error for the matter was listed on 18th May, 2017, for dictation of the judgment and thereafter. Accordingly, the date on the judgment be read as "25 th May, 2017".

The grounds raised for review of the judgment on the basis of the issue of parity of the allowances, PRP and DA on the basis of dearness to the two categories of "Executives" and "Workmen", (petitioners), have already been taken note of and dealt with by this Court as would be evident from a glance of the order of which review is prayed for.