Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: abdul rahim in The State Of Maharashtra vs Sayeed Mohd. Hanif Abdul Rahim on 10 February, 2012Matching Fragments
13. In view of the deemed withdrawal of prosecution against A4 and A5 and their consequent release from the case, POTA Special Case No.1 of 2004, thereafter, proceeded against the remaining accused i.e. accused no.1 Syed Mohammed Hanif Abdul Rahim, accused no.2. Ashrat @ Arshad Shafiq Ahmed Ansari and accused no.3 Fehmida wife of accused no.1 Syed Mohammed Hanif. At the conclusion of the said trial, the learned trial Judge held that out of the charges framed against said A1 to A3, each of them was guilty for commission of offences as described in the table given hereinbelow and sentenced each of them for respective offence for which they were found guilty, as stated in the third column against the respective offence mentioned in second column of the said table :