Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

14.1 It is stated in paragraph 2 of the petition that most of the members of the petitioner-Association are poor and are not aware about the complicated fabrics of the Act, Rules and Byelaws. Along with the petition list of 27 members of the petitioner No. 1 Association is supplied. Reading the same it appears that the members are occupiers of different properties/buildings situated on the C.G. Road.

15. Along with the petition, the petitioners have produced (at pages 42-43) copy of a communication dated 4th August 1990 between the Law Officer, Advocates' Esttb., AMC and the Deputy Municipal Commissioner (UD). The communication is with regard to change or amendment in Development Regulations. Even the proposed change in Regulation No. 80(1) provides that no person shall use the open space kept as open marketing place, consolidated open space, common plot, place for parking purpose, place for community utility and place for skip floor for any other purpose without previous permission in writing of the Municipal Commissioner. Thus, even this makes it clear that the petitioners were aware that even in the proposed resolution, it was not possible to use certain part of the property for the purposes other than for which the plans were approved.