Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

The Serology Report Ext. PY1 reads as under:­ Exhibits Species of origin ABO Grouping/ Remarks Blood Stains:­ '1f' Blood sample Sample was putrefied hence no opinion. '1g' Blood sample Sample was putrefied hence no opinion.


        Semen Stains:­ 

       '1c' Underwear                  ­­­­­­                                             Inconclusive
       '1h' Cotton wool swab           ­­­­­­                                              No reaction
       '1i' Cotton wool swab           ­­­­­­                                              No reaction

On careful perusal and analysis of the FSL report Ex. PX­1 although human semen was detected on Exhibits 1a2 (cervical slide), 1b1 & 1b2 (vaginal slide), 1c (one underwear), 1h (cervical swab) 1i (vaginal swab) of the prosecutrix but as per serology report Ext. PY1 on the exhibit 1c (underwear), the species of origin nothing could be determined and ABO Grouping remained­inconclusive.

On the Exhibit 1h and 1i, the species of origin, nothing could be determined and ABO Grouping gave "No Reaction".

While on careful perusal and analysis of the FSL report Ext. PX, blood was detected on Exhibit 7a (Gauze cloth piece) of the accused Suresh Malik and as per the serology report Ext. PY, on the Exhibit 7a, the blood was of human origin, with 'A' Group.

From above, on a conjoint reading of FSL reports Ext. PX1, Ext 19 of 35 PS Rohini South PY1, Ext. PX and Ext PY, it is clearly indicated that human semen was detected on Exhibits 1a2, 1b1, 1b2, 1c, 1h and 1i but it could not be established on the record that the said human semen belonged to accused Suresh Malik, as the serology report Ext. PY1 with regard to the ABO Grouping remained inconclusive/No reaction, as discussed here­in­above.