Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Further, perusal of the original record produced by the learned Assistant Government Pleader demonstrates that the so-called representation dated 21.12.2017 made by respondent 4 was, in fact, titled 'APPEAL UNDER ROR ACT'. In the said representation, he stated as follows:

'I submit that as I am the pattedar of agril. land bearing sy.no.70/3 Ext.0.30 gts. situated at Shakari Village of Nirmal mandal. Further I submit that without my consent the then Tahsildar, Nirmal has transferred the patta rights in favour of Smt.Gangishetty Rajamani W/o. Ramkishan r/o Nirmal during the year 1991-92 on the created sada binama.
Even otherwise, it may be noted that an appeal under Section 5-B of the Act of 1971 has to be filed in accordance with the procedure prescribed in Rule 22-A of the Rules of 1989. Such an appeal has to be in writing and should set forth concisely the grounds thereof. It shall also bear a Court fee stamp of Rs.5/-. The representation dated 21.12.2017 filed by respondent 4 under the caption 'Appeal under ROR Act' does not conform to the requirements of Rule 22-A, as no grounds were set out therein, concisely or otherwise, and it did not bear any Court fee stamp.