order dated 27.12.1960.
As per the relevant provisions of law regarding common plot
the predecessor-in-title (ancestor of the petitioners) as
erstwhile ruler ... common plot of 5%
of the total area for the purpose of the development. The plots
were made including the common plot
order dated
1.7.2014 whereby respondent No.1 Collector has
directed that common plot in the cooperative
housing society should not be used or allowed ... members of the society against commercial use of
the common plot of cooperative housing society,
on one hand respondent No.1 Collector issued
showcause
part of revenue survey no.627/2 being original
plot no.131, final plot no.110/3 known as Om Satya Farsan
House. The land ... road passes through the property
belonging to Rajmandir Tenaments, Omkar Fates, common
plots and gardens and Lakshmikunj Society from which
according to the petitioners
plot Nos. 72A and 72B which is the common plots of
Bhidbhanjan Industrial Society and to take appropriate
decision upon the aforesaid representation
Survey No.139/48, Municipal Census
No.16/48, which is Final Plot No.2 in the Town
Planning Scheme No.9 and that ... encroachment requiring
the authorities to take steps for such removal on
common open plot earmarked for parking and common use.
This Court dismissed the petition
orders of the High
Court reveals a common effect, i.e. the allotment of the institutional plot
made in favour of the appellant-Institute stands
while
seeking approval of the plan, the plots have been allotted only for the reason
that plots were lying vacant for a long time. Both ... allot
43 plots as against 3 plots advertised suffered from patent illegality. Even,
the process of allotment of three plots is far from fair
rule 3 of Punjab Village Common Land
(Regulation) Rule 1964 and one of these purpose
is the carving out plots for weaker sections of
society ... yards plots they shall
reserve 25% of the total land as Shamlat land for future
common needs of the inhabitants of the village. The writ
petitioner No. 2 for
regrant of both the Final Plots. As per the common order dated
07/09/2009 both the lands were decided ... petitioner -
societies purchased the Final Plot Nos. 51 and 50 respectively
and adjacent lands of Final Plot Nos. 51 and 50 were purchased
by another
orders
of the High Court reveals a common effect, i.e. the
allotment of the institutional plot made in favour of
the appellant-Institute stands