petitioner to compound the
offence within stipulated period and in absence of
any request to compound the offence, by paying
compounding fees, it was incumbent ... received the notice, the
petitioner would have compounded the offence by
paying the amount towards the compounding fees.
However, the petitioner, today also, is willing
petitioner to compound the
offence within stipulated period and in absence of
any request to compound the offence, by paying
compounding fees, it was incumbent ... received the notice, the
petitioner would have compounded the offence by
paying the amount towards the compounding fees.
However, the petitioner, today also, is willing
petitioner, however,
expressed his willingness to pay compounding fees of the vehicle by
filing an affidavit-cum-reply dated 27.5.2021; however, according to
the petitioner ... petitioner, was willing to
pay Rs.2 lakhs towards the compounding fees, however, the
respondent authority, has not bothered about the request of the
petitioner
royalty pass and
accordingly, royalty fee of Rs.38,350/ and
compounding fee of Rs.50,000/ were demanded. The
petitioner gave a written response
royalty pass and
accordingly, royalty fee of Rs.38,350/ and
compounding fee of Rs.50,000/ were demanded. The
petitioner gave a written response
royalty pass and
accordingly, royalty fee of Rs.38,350/ and
compounding fee of Rs.50,000/ were demanded. The
petitioner gave a written response
thereafter,
received a notice dated 24.06.2021 requiring the petitioner to pay
compounding fees of Rs.2,33,906/-. The petitioner, being aggrieved,
has preferred ... that this Court, has
clearly held that where the offences are not compounded, it would
be incumbent upon the authorised officer to approach the Court
amongst others and the bank guarantee of Rs.2 lacs
towards compounding fees. The petitioner requested the
respondent No.2 to release the vehicle; however
thereafter,
received a notice dated 24.06.2021 requiring the petitioner to pay
compounding fees of Rs.2,33,906/-. The petitioner, being aggrieved,
has preferred ... that this Court, has
clearly held that where the offences are not compounded, it would
be incumbent upon the authorised officer to approach the Court
willingness to
compound the offence; however, no decision was taken either for
the purpose of release of the vehicle or for compounding the
offence. According ... petitioner had also expressed his willingness
to pay the compounding fees; however, not considering the request
of the petitioner, the respondent authority had neither passed
