Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1146 (1.09 seconds)

Shriram Chits & Investments (P) Limited vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... on 30 August, 2012

defaulting subscribers. Section 29 refers to the circumstances under which there could be substitution of subscribers in the place of defaulting subscribers. Section 30 speaks ... subscribers. Chapter V ( Sections 31 to 33 ) speaks about the rights and duties of the prized subscribers. Section 31 states that the prized subscriber

Angammal vs R. Sankaranarayanan on 24 February, 1988

claim a consolidated payment of the future subscriptions from a defaulting subscriber without issuing a notice and inasmuch as Uma Investments did not issue ... suit is not by the Foreman against a defaulting subscriber. It was also further pointed out that even assuming the appellant stood in the position
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Angammal vs R. Sankaranarayanan on 24 February, 1988

claim a consolidated payment of the future subscriptions from a defaulting subscriber without issuing a notice and inasmuch as Uma Investments did hot issue ... suit is not by the Foreman against a defaulting subscriber. It was also further pointed out that even assuming the appellant stood in the position
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next