271DA. Penalty for failure to comply with provisions of section 269ST.
(1) If a person receives any sum in contravention of the provisions of section ... 269ST, he shall be liable to pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to the amount of such receipt: Provided that no penalty shall
Section 84 in The Finance Act, 2017
84. Insertion of new section 269ST.
- After section 269SS of the Income-tax Act, the following section shall ... inserted, namely:- `269ST. - No person shall receive an amount of two lakh rupees or more- (a) in aggregate from a person
receipts, as may be notified by the Central Government. [ Similar to Section 269ST from The Income
whether or not the transfer takes place. [ Similar to Section 269SS , Section 269ST and Section 269T from The Income
proviso of clause (i) of Explanation to section 80JJAA, section 269SS, section 269ST and section 269T, namely: - (a) Credit Card; (b) Debit Card
inserted, namely:- "271DA. Penalty for failiure to comply with provisions of section 269ST. - (1) If a person receives any sum in contravention of the provisions ... section 269ST, he shall be liable to pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to the amount of such receipt: Provided that no penalty
dated September 30, 2019 and
in pursuance to which penalty under section 269ST has been levied
on the petitioner ; and (b) the argument ... under section 245F and 245H
has no case of violation of section 269ST before it and thus does not
have exclusive jurisdiction in the matter
dated September 30, 2019 and
in pursuance to which penalty under section 269ST has been levied
on the petitioner ; and (b) the argument ... under section 245F and 245H
has no case of violation of section 269ST before it and thus does not
have exclusive jurisdiction in the matter
dated September 30, 2019 and
in pursuance to which penalty under section 269ST has been levied
on the petitioner ; and (b) the argument ... under section 245F and 245H
has no case of violation of section 269ST before it and thus does not
have exclusive jurisdiction in the matter
dated September 30, 2019 and
in pursuance to which penalty under section 269ST has been levied
on the petitioner ; and (b) the argument ... under section 245F and 245H
has no case of violation of section 269ST before it and thus does not
have exclusive jurisdiction in the matter
