Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

State vs . Sher Singh Etc. on 13 May, 2015 1 In the Court of Dig

that will decide whether the case falls under Section 302 or 304 Part I or 304 Part II. Many petty or insignificant matters plucking ... section 302 , are not converted into of­ fences punishable under section 304 Part I/II, or cases of cul­ pable homicide not amounting to murder

that will decide whether the case falls under Section 302 or 304 Part I or 304 Part II. Many petty or insignificant matters - plucking ... guilty for committing offence under Section 304 (Part-II) IPC read with section 34 IPC. 60 Before parting, I would, however, like to mention that

that will decide whether the case falls under Section 302 or 304 Part I or 304 Part II. Many petty or insignificant matters - plucking ... under Section 302, are not converted into offences punishable under Section 304 Part I/II, or cases of culpable homicide not amounting to murder

304 of IPC gets attracted. The counsels for three accused have argued that it is only Sec. 304 IPC, be it part-I or part ... circumstances, the conviction of the accused was converted to U/s 304 part-I of IPC . 26 In Surinder Kumar v. UT, Chandigarh

stabbed the deceased with the said knife on his vital part i.e on chest causing very deep injury resulted into his death. In these ... conviction of the JCL('UM') is modified to Section 304 part­I IPC instead of Section 302 IPC as held by the Juvenile

meaning of Section 299 and punishable under Section 304 part II IPC . 65 I, therefore, hold him guilty for offences under Section 30 of Arms ... offence under Section 304 (Part-II) IPC and simultaneously while invoking power contained under Section 357 (3) Cr.P.C., I also order that

Sangam Vihar U/s 279/337/304 A IPC Unique ID No. 02406R0145352002 JUDGMENT Sl. No. of the case : 210/2 (30.04.2002) Date ... Mandal, R/o New Sanjay Camp, Part II, Phase - I, Jhuggi Okhla, New Delhi. Offence complained of : 279/304 A IPC Plea of accused

I come to the third issue i.e whether accident was caused due to rash and negligent driving on the part of accused. To prove ... Road; U/s 279/304­A IPC DOD:27.08.2015 judgments cited above, I have no hesitation to hold that accident was caused due to rash

this court had convicted the convict on the lesser offence i.e., 304 Part-II of IPC yet considering the nature of the injuries inflicted ... convict, I sentence the convict to undergo RI for four years under Section 304 Part-II of IPC . He is further sentenced