Apex Court
in R.Rahinam V. State (AIR 2000 SC 1851).
5. In respect of the second submission, viz., reasons for cancelling the
bail order ... Puram V. Rambilas (AIR
2001 SC 2023) referring the decision in R.Rathinam V. State (AIR 2000 SC 1851)
has held that,
"A group
case of R. Rathinam v. State and Anr. AIR 2000 SC 1851 : 2000 (1) ACR 491(SC), that not only are the State, the complainant
opposite party no.2 and in view of AIR
2000 SC 1851, (2001) 6 SCC 338 and (2013) 16 SCC 190 has suffered mental
injury ... Therefore, in view of the decisions reported in AIR 2000 SC 1851 ( R.
Rathinam - vs - State
case of R. Rathinam v. The State and Anr. AIR 2000 SC 1851 submitted that law is well settled that power of cancellation of bail
Supreme Court has made it clear in AIR
2000 SC 1851 and AIR 2001 SC 2023 that power vested in the High
Court to cancel
Counsel relied on decision R.
Rathinam vs. State and Anr. (AIR 2000 SC 1851) as well as of this
High Court in Abdul Sattarbhai Mohmed
Rathinam vs. the State and Anr. reported as
AIR 2000 SC 1851 to contend that an application for cancellation of bail is
maintainable
case of R.Rathinam v. The State and another , AIR 2000
SC 1851 in support of his submission that the writ petition is
maintainable before
decision of
the Supreme Court in Mohan Singh V. Union Territory (AIR 1978
SC 1095). Reliance is also placed on the decision of the Karnataka ... held in R.Rathinam
V. The State and another (AIR 2000 SC 1851) that Superior court
can cancel the bail granted by a subordinate court
Apex Court in the
matter of R.Rathinam Vs. State , AIR 2000 SC 1851 has
observed in para 8 as under :-
It is not disputed
