documents in support of
the claim, but also on the affinity test and it is not
feasible to lay-down an absolute rule which could
Caste, to produce material as regards his/her ancestry in order to test the claim. In the present case, the petitioner did not produce ... father of the appellant has failed to satisfy the crucial affinity test which is relevant and germane one".
18. The petitioner, admittedly
often alluringly put forth to obviate the need to pass the
affinity test is only a convenient plea to get over the crux ... established primary practices of the
Gond community, does not satisfy the test of
affinity.
8.9. She places reliance on the judgement of this
Court
status and the officer or authority concerned
would get an opportunity to test the claim for social
status of particular caste or tribe or tribal ... father of the appellant has failed to satisfy the
crucial affinity test which is relevant and germane
one. On the other hand the entries
wherein it is
stated that while applying the affinity test, which
focuses on the ethnological connections with the
Scheduled Tribe, a cautious approach ... traditional characteristics of the Tribe. Hence it
is held that affinity test may not be regarded as the
litmus test but may be used
petitioner. He
has got three years experience as Test Engineer in the
5
Affinity Software Private Limited, Bangalore. He has
worked as Academy Coordinator ... Moreover the 2nd respondent has got the practical
experience as Test Engineer in the Affinity Software Private
Limited, Bangalore through GSM Technology, Bangalore
C. Kannan vs Returning Officer on 25 January, 1989
Equivalent citations: ILR1989KAR1081, 1989(1)KARLJ409
hold or
confers a right upon the accused to claim, a test
identification parade. They do not constitute
substantive evidence and these parades are
essentially ... governed by Section 162 of the Code.
Failure to hold a test identification parade would
not make inadmissible the evidence of identification
in Court
prcstlijbegz-:§'cE~..V_ lathe'l'i._ ee;ti'testing W'
respondents are not denied eitt-hei'L_~befQ ... their identity as
indepeiiéent--nj'e:"n~ben'~:_"affine tegisiative Assembly. It
really thel;3e'titit)n'etsiwilweifeéénot belonging
previous enmity or
animosity against the appellant nor they possessed extra
affinity towards P.W.5.
60. Taking note of these aspects of the matter ... pant pocket cannot be countenanced
in law as a the colour test stood positive even before the
money was actually asked to be taken