Karthikeyan ... Petitioner
Versus
Director of Training and Regional,
Central Apprenticeship Advisor
Board of Apprenticeship Training (Southern Region),
Ministry of Human Resource Development,
Government of India ... that in pursuance of the
recommendations of the Scientific Manpower Committee, the Apprenticeship
Training Scheme for Engineering Graduates and Diploma in Engineering, was
introduced during
Karthikeyan ... Petitioner
Versus
Director of Training and Regional,
Central Apprenticeship Advisor
Board of Apprenticeship Training (Southern Region),
Ministry of Human Resource Development,
Government of India ... that in pursuance of the
recommendations of the Scientific Manpower Committee, the Apprenticeship
Training Scheme for Engineering Graduates and Diploma in Engineering, was
introduced during
ground that the authority has wrongly considered the period of
apprenticeship as a period of employment, while granting the benefits of
gratuity.
2. The brief ... raised a dispute alleging that the petitioner had failed
to consider his apprenticeship period from 24.08.1973 to 15.01.1975 while
computing his total service period
Exchanges, where they have been enrolled their technical
qualification for selection for apprenticeship and they undergone one year
apprenticeship training and obtained course completion certificate ... from the
respondent's company and National Apprenticeship Certificate from National
Council for Vocational Training, Ministry of Labour, and Government of India.
After obtaining
petitioner is that the petitioner is an ITI holder
and undergone Apprenticeship training for one year in the respondent
Board prior to 13.09.1988. The respondent ... matter of appointment to the
apprentices those who had undergone apprenticeship in the respondent
Board. But all of a sudden, the respondent Board issued
judis
W.P.No.34619 of 2024
and undergone Apprenticeship training for one year in the respondent
Board prior to 13.09.1988. The respondent Board ... matter of appointment to the
apprentices those who had undergone apprenticeship in the respondent
Board. But all of a sudden, the respondent Board issued
petitioner is that the petitioner is an ITI holder
and undergone Apprenticeship training for one year in the respondent
Board prior to 13.09.1988. The respondent ... matter of appointment to the
apprentices those who had undergone apprenticeship in the respondent
Board. But all of a sudden, the respondent Board issued
petitioner is that the petitioner is an ITI holder
and undergone Apprenticeship training for one year in the respondent
Board prior to 13.09.1988. The respondent ... matter of appointment to the
apprentices those who had undergone apprenticeship in the respondent
Board. But all of a sudden, the respondent Board issued
exchange. Subsequently,
they were sponsored by the employment exchange for undergoing
the apprenticeship training with BHEL. For the purpose of
imparting training, the respondent-BHEL ... petitioners were inducted as apprentice. After undergoing the
examination and completing the apprenticeship training, they
were also issued with the certificates to that effect
India through Industrial Training Institute
and completion of successful training in
apprenticeship under the Apprentices Act
1961; or
(v) Must possess a Diploma in Civil
