Principles of State Policy contained in Clauses (e) and (f) of Article 39 , Articles 41 and 42 are not enforceable in a Court ... live with human dignity enshrined in Article 21 , more so in the context of Article 256 which provides that the executive power of every State
All India Lawyers Union (Delhi Unit) ... vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Others on
Builders Association Of India And Ors. ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. Etc. Etc
Article 21 derives its life breath from the Directive Principles of State Policy an particularly clauses (e) and (f) of Article 39 and Articles ... would amount to denial of protection under Article 21 more so in the context of Article 256. The State of Haryana must therefore ensure that
Principles of State Policy contained in Clauses (e) and (f) of Article 39 , Articles 41 and 42 are not enforceable in a Court ... live with human dignity enshrined in Article 21 , more so in the context of Article 256 which provides that the executive power of every State
directors by rotation is provided by sections 255 and 256 of the Act and Articles 109-112. To these details also I shall revert later ... Proprietary Mines Ltd. (1948 Ch. Div. 145) concerning an article provision somewhat similar to section 256(4)(b)(1). The concerned article provision in that
agent of the Singapore Company within the meaning of Article 5 (8) read
with Article 8 and 9 of DTAA.
ITA 1278/2010,ITA 1280 ... Article 5 (1) of
DTAA through its dependent agent ANR. The Tribunal has also held that
even in terms of Article 5 (8) , Article
Article 365 of the
At & Post Office: Kendur, Constitution of India aided by the "or
PS: Khandaghosh otherwise" provision of its Article ... otherwise" provision of Article 356 (1) of the Constitution of India,
along with Articles like, 256, 257(1), 365, 1, 261, the Preamble
most effective and
At & Post Office: Kendur, timely invocation of Article 365 of
PS: Khandaghosh, the Constitution of India aided by
Dist; Burdwan (East ... otherwise" provision of Article 356 (1) of the
Constitution of India, along with Articles like, 256, 257(1), 365, 1, 261, the
Preamble
make the food article injurious to
health. Relying on Khushi Ram v. State & Anr. , 1984(II) FAC 256, the
learned ASJ held that since
