ocular evidence and the medical
evidence on record do not tally, the ocular evidence would be preferred
unless the medical evidence is such as would ... impossible to
accept the ocular evidence on record. In the present case, although the
ocular evidence speaks about three bullet wounds, the medical evidence
Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
42. The exception to hearsay evidence does not convert indirect evidence to
direct evidence. The exception only removes the road block ... fire any more bullets since he had already suffered two bullet
injuries is admissible in terms of Section 7 of the Evidence Act. The said
Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
42. The exception to hearsay evidence does not convert indirect evidence to
direct evidence. The exception only removes the road block ... fire any more bullets since he had already suffered two bullet
injuries is admissible in terms of Section 7 of the Evidence Act. The said
Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
42. The exception to hearsay evidence does not convert indirect evidence to
direct evidence. The exception only removes the road block ... fire any more bullets since he had already suffered two bullet
injuries is admissible in terms of Section 7 of the Evidence Act. The said
evidence of the victim P.W. 5, therefore, finds corroboration
from the evidence of the doctor P.W. 2 that he sustained bullet injury ... both
from the evidence of the injured and the evidence of the doctor it is clear
that P.W. 5 sustained bullet injury
interested witness as no evidence
appeared from his cross-examination and there was no reason to disbelieve his
evidence.
One bullet head was seized from ... evidence of P.W.
20 and P.W. 21. They spoke about firing of two rounds whereas the Doctor
found only one bullet.
Referring
evidence adduced by PW 1 in Court with the evidence adduced in
Court by other purported eyewitnesses read with the evidence of the
medical expert ... evidence.
According to the evidence of PW 4, though he had heard the sound of firing he
could not say whether any of the bullets
guide this Court's appreciation of the evidence
in the present case.
A. Ballistic Evidence and the Recovered Firearm
29. A fundamental pillar ... Supra), it was held that
inconsistency between the evidence of the prosecution witness and
medical evidence is a fundamental defect in the prosecution case,
which
guide this Court's appreciation of the evidence
in the present case.
A. Ballistic Evidence and the Recovered Firearm
29. A fundamental pillar ... Supra), it was held that
inconsistency between the evidence of the prosecution witness and
medical evidence is a fundamental defect in the prosecution case,
which
guide this Court's appreciation of the evidence
in the present case.
A. Ballistic Evidence and the Recovered Firearm
29. A fundamental pillar ... Supra), it was held that
inconsistency between the evidence of the prosecution witness and
medical evidence is a fundamental defect in the prosecution case,
which
