upon and
such lapses ignored. Noticing the possibility of investigation
being designedly defective, this Court in Dhanaj Singh v. State
of Punjab , held ... into the hands
of the investigating officer if the investigation is designedly
defective.’
28. Dealing with the cases of omission and commission, the Court
Sanjay Dutt vs State Of Maharashtra Tr.Cbi,Bombay on 21 March, 2013
Equivalent citations
awarded death sentence, no
special reasons were assigned by the Designated Court and he was not even
furnished the whole judgment. By highlighting various aspects ... Though Mr. Gopal Subramanium met all
the submissions relating to the alleged defect in the impugned judgment,
first let us consider the decisions relied
this Court observed, that if primacy is given to a designed or
negligent investigation, or to the omissions or lapses created as a
result ... held by this Court that the court must ensure that the
defective investigation purposely carried out by the Investigating
Officer, does not affect the credibility
Reshma Kumari & Ors vs Madan Mohan & Anr on 2 April, 2013
Equivalent citations
U.P.Power Corporation Ltd. & Ors vs Anis Ahmad on 1 July, 2013
Equivalent
Gian Chand & Ors vs State Of Haryana on 23 July, 2013
Equivalent citations: AIR
Shankar Kisanrao Khade vs State Of Maharashtra on 25 April, 2013
Author: K.S. Radhakrishnan
Sarah Mathew vs Inst., Cardio Vascular Diseases & Ors on 26 November, 2013
Equivalent citations
Nirmala J. Jhala vs State Of Gujarat & Anr on 18 March, 2013
Equivalent citations
