Section 134 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
shall be the duty of every registered medical practitioner or the doctor on the duty in the hospital immediately to attend to the injured person
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 490096 (1.10 seconds)Raj Kumar vs Ajay Kumar & Anr on 18 October, 2010
claiming compensation.
7. The percentage of permanent disability is expressed by the Doctors
with reference to the whole body, or more often than not, with ... different types of injuries, in the
case of workmen. If a Doctor giving evidence uses technical medical terms,
the Tribunal should instruct him to state
Jacob Mathew vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 5 August, 2005
room contacted the duty nurse, who in her turn called
some doctor to attend to the patient. No doctor turned up for about ... between, 5 to
7 minutes were wasted. By this time, another doctor came who
declared that the patient was dead. The latter part
The State Of Punjab vs Gurmit Singh & Ors on 16 January, 1996
medical examination of the prosecutrix. She was
medically examined by lady doctor Dr. Sukhwinder Kaur, PW1
on 2.4.84, who found that the hymen ... police took
into possession a sealed percel handed over by the lady
doctor containing the salwar of the prosecutrix alongwith 5
slides of vaginal smears
Indian Medical Association vs V.P. Shantha & Ors on 13 November, 1995
United Kingdom, it has been said :
"Where, then, does the doctor stand
today in relation to society? To some
extent, he is a servant ... competitive alternative to existing health insurance plans
and by agreement amongst the doctors established the
schedule of maximum fees that participating doctors agreed
to accept
Dr. J.J. Merchant & Ors vs Shrinath Chaturvedi on 12 August, 2002
Delhi in Original
Petition No.252 of 1993 by the appellants - doctors praying that
complaint filed for alleged medical negligence be either dismissed as
according ... present case involves complicated question of facts for which experts
including doctors would be required to be examined and their cross-
examination may be necessary
State Of Rajasthan vs Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta on 1 December, 2011
prepared in his clinic.
25. According to the statement of this doctor and the
prescription, the respondent was suffering from Epilepsy and
while describing post ... left eyebrow was
also present. According to the doctor, all these injuries were
ante mortem in nature and the cause of death was shock
Rajiv Thapar & Ors vs Madan Lal Kapoor on 23 January, 2013
presence of a large hole in her heart.
On the advice of doctors who attended on Dr. Monica Thapar at Medical
College, Surat ... admitted in the Urmil Heart Hospital. He
further stated after Echo-Cardiography doctor declared that
Monika was suffering from A.S.D. (Larger Hole
Nizam'S Institute Of Medical Sciences vs Prasanth S.Dhananka & Ors on 14 May, 2009
part of Dr. P.V. Satyanarayana and the other attending
doctors and also making NIMS vicariously liable and the State
of Andhra Pradesh statutorily liable ... negligence of the
doctors concerned. Allegations was primarily levelled against
Dr. P.V. Satyanarayana for negligence before, during and after
the operation. It was alleged
Nallapati Sivaiah vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Guntur, A.P on 26 September, 2007
same day in the
hospital. P.W.10 Professor and Doctor of Forensic
Medicine conducted the post-mortem on examination ... found that before
the dying declarations were recorded "opinions of the
doctors attending on the deceased were also obtained